|
|
In August 2000, the DOE Mound Site conducted an analysis to determine what kind of information about the Mound Site should continue to be available after the site closes and DOE exits. DOE Mound personnel also wanted to identify how this information should be made available in the future (e.g. libraries of paper documents, electronic transmission through an Internet site, or some combination of both). The project was conducted as a part of Landtrek, a program that provides Internet access to site closure information. The Landtrek sponsor was John Lee of DOE's Oakland office, and the Mound Site sponsor was Arthur Kleinrath.
The table below is an excerpt from the document Mound Site Assessment of Post-Closure Data Needs, documenting the results of the analyses and submitted as a draft to the project sponsors. The complete document will be released upon sponsor approval. The table shows results from a series of interviews conducted with Mound Site employees, employees of regulatory agencies, members of stakeholder groups, and employees of other local, city, or state organizations that currently take an interest in the Mound Site. Based on these interviews, the table summarizes information needs and access preferences for five different groups of users represented by the interviewees.
In the next phase of this project, DOE Mound will review the specific information needs to determine electronic versus paper-based maintenance of the data given technical limitations and user preferences. In the meantime, a prototype web site to demonstrate the organization of a future electronic information source has been developed, and is accessible through DOE Mound Site: Past and Present .
Table 2 Information Needs Summary by User Group
| User Information Group |
General Information Needs |
Preferred Media |
Preferred Access |
Special Considerations / Comments |
| General Public |
Information on Mound Site activities, including general events and cleanup
actions. Information required to participate in the CERCLA process by reviewing and commenting on
the cleanup actions performed onsite. This group has an interest in learning about Mound's role
in U.S. History; the programs, processes, and operations performed onsite; as well as the impacts
from these processes and operations on human health and the environment. In the future, the
general public wants to ensure that the site remains protective of human health and the
environment for its intended use. |
Paper - concern that not all public users have electronic access. |
Paper mechanism similar to CERCLA Public Reading Room, preferable near or on the
Mound Site.
Web site access is also preferred for general information and "news item" information for
current activities. |
Need access to a more extensive repertoire of site pictures and photographs -
preferably through a kiosk.
Need access to detailed vs. summary information on past operations, contamination, and cleanup.
Expressed interest in information on human health and environmental impacts of contaminants
found at Mound. |
| Real Estate Transactions |
Information related to property transfer and leasing arrangements; including
information associated with availability, characteristics, conditions, and legal requirements of
parcels of property or buildings from preparation for transfer through post-transfer. A primary
document is the QuitClaim Deed, which dictates the terms and conditions associated with property
transfer, and documents historical contamination and cleanup activities. |
Electronic - maps, current building layouts, property descriptions, QuitClaim
Deed, Mound 2000 documentation.
Paper - as-built drawings, pre-Mound 2000 documentation. |
Electronic - through city or regional web site for maps, building layouts, site
demographics.
Paper access to old drawings, legal documents, or city-processed paperwork may also be
required. |
Expressed interest in existing GIS-based resources. However, expressed concern
that required expertise to retain a GIS system after closure may not be feasible. |
| Regulatory Compliance |
Regularly receives monitoring data to ensure compliance with permits, CERCLA
regulations, Ohio State Regulations, and other Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-mandated
monitoring/documentation requirements. These individuals advise the site on monitoring planning,
and assist the public in validating site monitoring results or addressing public concerns. This
group needs to be informed of any changes in site conditions, such as soil movement offsite,
spikes in monitoring data, or discovery of additional contamination. |
Electronic - CD ROM, spreadsheet of monitoring data (including point discharges of
surface water, soil, and ground water data).
Paper / electronic- Mound 2000 documentation, site maps, other technical information.
Updates to agency-maintained databases. |
Electronic - same as current for monitoring data.Electronic access to documents
and data is preferred.
Paper-only access to some documentation may be unavoidable. |
Requires now and in the future detailed technical information and raw data that
can be accessed and manipulated.
Expressed interest in GIS-based information and maps. |
| Miamisburg City Management |
Needs general information on cleanup status, existing contamination, on-going DOE
operations, stored chemicals, and infrastructure. This information is required to communicate to
the public and local/state authorities, and respond to emergencies, should they occur onsite.
Currently, the city has representatives that participate on the Mound Reuse Committee to serve as
a bridge between DOE and the public. |
Paper and electronic - NPDES permit report and data.
Paper and electronic - monitoring data in spreadsheet format.
Not all information needs have been identified. |
Download electronically for NPDES and monitoring data.
Paper media for maps and other official documents is preferred. |
Will require access to post-closure information and events (e.g. construction
uncovers some contamination or debris) that may be of interest to the public and/or will require
an official response from DOE, steward, or regulatory agencies) and keep up to date on "news item"
kind of information. To be informed of events and be able to respond in a timely manner, a
notification process will need to be in place.
A web site for historical and background information would be useful to this group as a
reference for exit-state site conditions. |
| Worker Transition |
To be determined. |
To be determined. |
To be determined. |
To be determined. |
|
|